Skip to work

B2B SaaS · Product & Web

Attributy

If the budget decision is hard, the interface should not be.

Role
UI/UX Designer & Creative Lead
Tools
Figma · Figma Motion · Photoshop
Year
2025 to now
Live
Visit site ↗

Attributy reconciles every channel a company spends on, online and offline, into one view of what drove revenue. Its buyers arrive sceptical. Every vendor promises them the same thing.

I lead design here: the site end to end and the product interface beside it. Around fifty pages, still growing.

50
pages across the site architecture
20
product pages, one per capability
10
solutions pages by industry and role
13
ad platform integrations documented
Attributy website design

How this project was made

The artifacts on this page, in the order they were produced. Each pill jumps to its section.

Competitive analysis

Who else sells this, what they show, and where the gap is.

FeaturesFosphaCometlyTriple WhaleNorthbeamRuler Analytics
Core features
  • Full funnel MMM at ad level, refreshed daily.
  • Marketplace coverage: Amazon and TikTok Shop beside the site.
  • Health check, optimization, planning and reporting modules.
  • Multi touch attribution with eight models side by side.
  • An agent that answers questions on the attribution data.
  • Conversion API, CRM and warehouse sync, MCP.
  • Multi touch attribution on its own pixel.
  • Moby, an AI assistant that proposes the next three moves.
  • A data platform underneath, MMM listed in the footer.
  • Multi touch attribution.
  • Media mix modeling.
  • Incrementality testing. The three are sold as one suite.
  • Multi touch and data driven attribution.
  • Offline touchpoints and revenue from the CRM.
  • Impression attribution plus an AI analyst and media planner.
Model
  • Retail commerce brands.
  • Positioned as a measurement operating system.
  • Pricing page in the nav, demo led.
  • B2B SaaS companies.
  • Self serve start beside the demo.
  • Pricing in the nav.
  • Ecommerce, Shopify first.
  • Free tier with no credit card, demo as the second door.
  • Pricing in the nav.
  • Ecommerce brands and agencies.
  • Demo led, pricing in the nav.
  • Lead generation and B2B, based in the UK.
  • Demo led, with a phone number in the header.
Strengths
  • Client logos and a 30% higher ROAS claim right under the hero.
  • A real screenshot of the app on the platform page.
  • The cleanest capability pages in the set: one control per page, explained.
  • The agent is treated as the product, not a feature.
  • Product screens everywhere, from the hero card to the attribution table.
  • A free entry point lowers the ask.
  • The three methods are named plainly in the nav.
  • A strong client logo bar and one consistent dark visual system.
  • The shortest demo form in the set, three fields.
  • A concrete checklist of what the demo covers.
Weaknesses
  • Homepage proof is charts and product photography, not the interface.
  • The demo form runs two steps and six fields.
  • Nothing of the product above the fold on the homepage.
  • Attribution, the core, sits one level under the agent.
  • Ecommerce only.
  • A chat widget and a video overlay compete with every page.
  • The hero is a diagram of three words. The product appears on inner pages.
  • The demo form asks six fields plus a revenue band.
  • An illustrated ring in the hero rather than a screen.
  • The capability page opens on the demo form, before any screen.
Gap for Attributy
  • Show the interface itself in the hero, not the results of it.
  • Put the product on the homepage first. Agentic AI is one of six views, not the front door.
  • Offline channels: TV, radio and out of home beside digital, which none of the ecommerce tools cover.
  • Solutions by industry and by role, so an agency or a CMO reads a page written for them.
  • The same brevity on the demo form, with the product visible before the ask.

Landscape read, September 2026, from the public sites. Strengths and weaknesses are about what each site shows a buyer, not about the products' results. Measured.com was unreachable when I ran this and is left out.

UX benchmarking

The same job, on competitors' own pages, with the details that decided my direction marked.

Homepage proof

  • Fospha shows results as chart tiles and brand photography, not the interface. A one field email form sits in the hero.
  • Northbeam opens with a diagram of three model names and one button. The product waits on the inner pages.
  • Triple Whale puts its AI assistant's answer card in the hero, next to an inline email field. The screen is the pitch.
  • Cometly leads with a headline and two buttons. Nothing of the product above the fold.
What I did instead

Six real platform views on a tab switcher, directly under the question. The product is the proof.

fospha homepage
Fospha homepage
northbeam homepage
Northbeam homepage
triple whale homepage
Triple Whale homepage
cometly homepage
Cometly homepage

The demo path

  • Every competitor gates the demo behind five or six required fields. A phone number is required on three of them.
  • Fospha splits the form in two steps and shows a progress bar, so the ask feels shorter than it is.
  • Ruler asks for a name, a company and an email. Nothing else. The shortest path in the set.
  • Northbeam and Cometly write what the thirty minutes will cover next to the form.
What I did instead

Book a Demo rides the nav on every page, so the ask is never more than one click away, and the page says what the call covers before it asks for anything.

fospha demo form
Fospha demo form
ruler analytics demo form
Ruler Analytics demo form
triple whale demo form
Triple Whale demo form
cometly demo form
Cometly demo form

Explaining one capability

  • Fospha and Triple Whale put a real screen next to the capability's headline.
  • Cometly shows a single control, the attribution model picker. One control explains the feature better than a whole dashboard would.
  • Northbeam illustrates the capability with an isometric drawing of cards. Handsome, not the product.
  • Ruler opens the capability page on the demo form, before any screen. All five run one template across their product pages.
What I did instead

One skeleton for twenty product pages: the capability, the real screen, the question it answers, the demo.

fospha platform page
Fospha platform page
cometly attribution page
Cometly attribution page
triple whale attribution page
Triple Whale attribution page
northbeam attribution page
Northbeam attribution page
ruler analytics attribution page
Ruler Analytics attribution page

Benchmarking takeaways

Three things the landscape made obvious.

  • 1

    Everyone promises one view of revenue. Almost no one shows the screen where it happens.

    Four of the five homepages open with a headline, a diagram or a chart. The interface, the thing a buyer will live in, arrives a scroll or a click later.

  • 2

    The demo form is where the buyer decides how much to trust you.

    Five or six required fields is the norm, phone number included. Ruler's three field form is the exception, and it reads as confidence.

  • 3

    Capability pages are a system, not a page.

    Every competitor runs one template across its product pages. The difference is what goes in the visual slot: a real screen, one control, or an illustration.

What mattered

The decisions that shaped everything below.

1

Show the product, do not describe it

Six real platform views on a tab switcher, directly under the headline. No diagram of arrows and clouds standing in for the interface.

2

One question, in their words

“Revenue is happening. Do you know where?” They are already asking themselves that. Everything under the line is evidence.

3

Built to outgrow me

Twenty product pages, ten solutions, thirteen integrations. Each family shares one skeleton, so marketing ships a new page without a designer.

4

Answers, not dashboards

Ask the Agentic AI view which offline channel drives digital revenue and it answers in a sentence, numbers underneath. The table is still there for the analysts.

What I would measure

Success, written down before the screens, so the design has something to answer to.

  • Demo requests from product pages

    Share of demo forms started on a product page rather than the homepage. Tells me whether the capability pages sell or only explain.

  • Tab switcher engagement

    Share of homepage visitors who open a second product tab. The switcher is the proof. If nobody clicks, it is decoration.

  • Scroll to proof

    Share of visitors who reach the logos and case studies. If the hero answers the question, they keep going.

  • Time to first product view

    Seconds between landing and the first real screen on the page. The design's job is to make this small.

  • Pages shipped without a designer

    New product, solutions and integration pages that marketing publishes on the templates alone. The system works if this number grows.

User flow

The steps a person takes to finish the one job this design protects.

  1. 1Land
  2. 2The question
  3. 3Product tabs
  4. 4Solutions page
  5. 5Proof
  6. Convinced?
  7. yes
    1. Book a Demo
    2. Confirmation
  8. no
    1. Pricing
    2. Resources
    then back to Proof

Red route.Everything is measured against one action: booking the demo. The site earns it, the product proves it.

Structure before styling

Hierarchy and placement on the key screens, drawn as blocks so the layout can be judged without the colour.

homepage
Nav · Solutions · Product · Integrations · Resources · Pricing · Book a DemoThe question, two lines, centredBook a DemoTabSidebarReal product view, one per tabTrusted by · client logosOne platform. Every measurement job.
product page
NavProduct · familyCapability headline, four linesBook a DemoReal product view for this capabilityWhat is it, in one sentenceFeature, the question it answersReal product viewChartFeature, mirrored
solutions page
NavSolutions · industryHeadline written for this buyerBook a DemoPhotograph, the buyer at workOne numberClient logosTheir problem, in their wordsPainPainPainThe unified viewReal product view, cross channel attribution

Structure, drawn from the shipped screens. Blocks are measured from attributy.com at 1440 wide in September 2026, not from early sketches.

Colour

The palette and what each family is allowed to do.

Purple

The brand family, as a scale. Full saturation is reserved for the one primary action per section. Tints carry the presence.

  • #3F29B3
  • #5A3DE6
  • #6B4CFF
  • #8C6FFF
  • #B8A3FF
  • #D9CCFF
  • #ECE5FF
  • #F6F3FF

Ink

Text and structure. The neutrals do most of the work so the purple can mean something.

  • #0D0A1F
  • #2A2440
  • #6B6786
  • #A09CB8
  • #ECE8F5
  • #FBFAFF

Support

Semantic only. Green for a positive delta or a confirmation, coral for attention, blue for information.

  • #1FB364
  • #E8744A
  • #3A6DF0

Type

The typeface, shown at the sizes it ships at.

Revenue is happening. Do you know where?

  • Sans serif
  • Variable
  • Tight display

Inter

Stop guessing. Start knowing. Attributy reconciles every channel, online and offline, into one true view of what actually drives revenue.

One family for the whole site. Display runs at 58 with tracking pulled to minus 1.5 so a long sentence lands as one object. Body sits at 17.5 with air, because this subject needs paragraphs.

  1. 1

    Product tab switcher

    Six labelled tabs, real screens, one frame. The homepage centrepiece.

  2. 2

    Platform shell

    Dark sidebar, light workspace, one navigation across all five product views.

  3. 3

    Page templates

    Three skeletons holding fifty pages in line as the site grows.

  4. 4

    Insight card

    One reconciled number and the comparison behind it.

UI screens

The shipped screens, with the details worth a second look numbered.

  • 1The question in the buyer's words, before any feature.
  • 2Book a Demo, the one action every page is measured against.
  • 3Six real platform views on one tab switcher. No diagram standing in for the product.
  • 4Offline channels sit in the same model as digital. The line the ecommerce tools cannot write.
Attributy homepage hero
  • 1Five goals as cards, one selected. The optimizer starts from a business question, not a chart.
  • 2Dark sidebar, light workspace: one shell across every product view.
  • 3Lift in green, the number itself in ink. Colour marks the delta, not the value.
Budget optimizer
  • 1The question, in plain language, in a purple bubble.
  • 2The answer in a sentence: which offline channel drives digital revenue. The numbers follow underneath.
Agentic AI view
Attributy product page on a phone
Attributy homepage on a phone
Attributy solutions page on a phone

The same pages at phone width.

platform: budget optimizer and agentic ai
Attributy, Platform: budget optimizer and agentic AI
attributy
Attributy full page design

Outcomes

What shipped, and where it lives.

  • Live at attributy.com
  • Around 50 pages across product, solutions and resources
  • Product UI plus the marketing site
  • Visit the live site ↗

Attribution is an argument about where money went. My job was to make that argument readable in one screen.

Gentiana
← All projectsNext projectFlori Diamonds →